“32 Died From The Vaccine, 16 Died From COVID” — Abrien Aguirre, Hawaiian Healthcare Worker
  • And the following headline came out of England today (September 1, 2021), but the remarks above the headline come from a group of American doctors and scientists who just yesterday posted an incredible analysis on the CDC’s website, of the CDC’s own data:

    Dr. André De Lorenzi, MD, is an infectious disease specialist from Brazil:

    Make no mistake, reader, no matter your opinion of Covid or of me or of my “radicalized” laissez-faire views or of anything else: the way the Wuhan virus has from the very beginning been dealt with and, continuing on through to the present moment and culminating in the repeated injections of hundreds of millions of people with an experimental Gene Transfer platform that’s not been properly vetted or tested for longterm safety precautions (and for the first time in the known history of American medicine also administered to thousands and thousands of pregnant women before any testing for safety-during-pregnancy had been conducted) — it constitutes a clear and unequivocal series of crime against humanity. These are absolute violations of the Nuremberg Code. But even more than that: they are absolute violations of individual human rights.

    “To hold to the position of denying compassionate care to patients, and to create fear, suffering, hospitalization and death, is an immoral act. It is unethical, and in civil court, it is illegal. All of you [doing so] will be hunted. Every single one of you listening right now will be hunted, and justice will be served.

    These are considered crimes against humanity.”

    — Dr. Peter McCullough, Cardiologist

    As I have written about many times in the past — and most recently in my latest novel — there is no population problem. There never has been.

    It was all a lie.

    The population of the entire world could fit shoulder-to-shoulder in a space about the size of Jacksonville, Florida. If you allotted to each person 1,250 square feet — which is a lot of space — all the people in the world today would fit into the state of Texas.

    Ninety-seven percent of the earth’s land surface is empty.

    According to the Food and Agriculture Organization, world food supplies exceed requirements in all world areas, amounting to a surplus approaching fifty percent in the developed countries, and seventeen percent in developing countries.

    Africa, beset with problems invariably blamed on overpopulation, has in actuality only one-fifth the population density of Europe.

    Africa also has a vast unexploited food-raising potential that could feed twice the present population of the entire world.

    Economists writing for the International Monetary Fund correctly report that Africa’s endless economic problems result from excessive government spending, high taxes on farmers, inflation (which comes about from manufacturing fiat money), restrictions on trade, and especially the lack of private property rights, which includes and entails the over-regulation of private economic activity.

    The rate of population increase across the entire planet has been steadily falling since the early 1960’s. It is a peculiarity of great proportions that virtually nobody knows this. It is perhaps also a testament to the power of doomsday propaganda and the superstitious thinking which breeds such propaganda and which simultaneously keeps such propaganda alive and transmuting. Still, the facts remain:

    On every part of every continent, in every culture — including Mormon, Muslim, and Catholic — birthrates are and have long-been in worldwide free-fall, having reached what demographers call replacement level: 

    Human beings are a species that slows its own population expansion once the division of labor reaches the point at which individuals are all trading goods and services with each other — rather than trying to subsist in a dangerous and often deadly state of insularity and self-sufficiency, so-called.

    In no species but the human species do individuals become more specialized as populations rise, nor less specialized as populations fall, and the ramifications of this principle are extraordinary.

    (Source)

    Eugenics have long been ultra-fashionable among political elites and bureaucrats — for well over a century, in fact — long before the Nazis came to power: everyone from Teddy Roosevelt to the racist-eugenist Margret Sanger, founder of Planned Parenthood, who spoke at Ku Klux Klan meetings, to quasi-scientist Paul Erlich and his friend John Holdren, who was Barack Obama’s science advisor for eight years, and who in his poorly written book Ecoscience (cowritten with Paul Erlich), wrote among many other horrific things, the following:

    “Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems…. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock.”

    “A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men…. The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”

    “The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the limits.”

    “It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society.”

    “Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.”

    (Paul Erlich and John Holdren, former science advisor to Barack Obama: Source)

    The boldface emphasis in the final quote above is all mine, and I’d enshrine my boldface emphasis there for all human history, because I think it’s so important.

    Please do not imagine that eugenics has gone away or are a thing of the past.

    They are not.

    They are as alive and well now as they ever were.

    Eugenics are trendy. Communist China has always advocated eugenics, in one for or another, like virtually all other communistic regimes. Bill Gates, like Ezekiel Emanuel (Rahm Emanuel’s brother and medical advisor to Barack Obama [Ezekiel’s support of eugenics can be seen on video here]), who has praised China for it’s “top-down government,” also favors them: bureaucratic elites, in other words, who believe it’s their right determine for all of society who lives and who dies.

    The intellectual achievement — the profundity and the inviolate truth of the concept of individual rights — is so far beyond the scope of any of these people that it’s absurd. You can’t even think of them in that same context. These are not people with good intentions, I promise you that, and we must all stand up to them.

    Your life is your own.

    Freedom is your birthright.

    You are not the property of any government, nor are you the property of any other person. You are your own person, and every individual, regardless of race, racial pedigree, color, class, country, creed, sex, sexual orientation, gender, income level, or anything else, possesses the absolute and inalienable right to her own life and property — and only her own life and property.

    Anyone who says otherwise is absolutely wrong.


    September 2nd, 2021 | journalpulp | No Comments |

About The Author

Ray Harvey

I was born and raised in the San Juan Mountains of southwestern Colorado. I've worked as a short-order cook, construction laborer, crab fisherman, janitor, bartender, pedi-cab driver, copyeditor, and more. I've written and ghostwritten several published books and articles, but no matter where I've gone or what I've done to earn my living, there's always been literature and learning as the constant in my life.

Leave a Reply

* Name, Email, and Comment are Required

%d bloggers like this: