Checkmate
  • I was once quite obsessed with the game of chess. For about three years of my young-adult life, I ate, drank, and slept it. It eventually came to a point where almost everything I did — basketball, driving, bartending, et cetera — it all somehow fit itself into the metaphor of a chessboard. I even found myself dreaming almost every night about chess, and it was at this point that I decided it was time for me to pull back from the noble game.

    Still, I will admit that chess got in my blood so profoundly that I cannot help thinking about it in certain contexts — one of these being the Wuhan virus and the geopolitcal gambits of the powers-that-be: poor players, all of them, relying on sheer subterfuge, manipulation, wild and stupid sacrifices, and, most especially, outright cheating when they think no one will notice.

    It’s in this context I speak when I tell you in all sincerity, after closely considered opinion, that the following represents checkmate — and the government and bureaucrats just lost:

    Anthony Fauci, who is not a pawn but more like a bishop, recently admitted what many good doctors have been screaming for months and months: namely, that early use of Monoclonal Antibody treatment for the Wuhan virus can (and I quote) “cut risk of hospitalization and death up to 85 percent.”

    That quoted statement — by Fauci — was only very recently made, less than a week ago today (August 30, 2021):

    The moment Fauci made that statement, the experienced chess-player knew instantly that this represented game-over: it was a sloppy blunder on Fauci’s part, which ultimately cost the entire opposition their deadly geopolitical game.

    The checkmate is a mathematical certainty from here.

    All one has to do is follow the moves through to their logical and inescapable conclusion:

    Because that percentage of reduced death and hospitalization — 85% — is approximately equivalent to the claimed benefits of the experimental Gene Transfer vaccines. And yet Monoclonal Antibody treatment has been around from the beginning. Also, when all other factors are taken into account, Monoclonal Antibody treatment is superior because it does not drive variants, as Gene Transfer injections do, nor does it have anywhere near the number of risks and side-effects associated with it, nor does it require the state-violation of individual autonomy.

    Of course, the question is: why are you only now telling people about it, when Monoclonal Antibody treatment has been available from the very beginning, and when many good doctors, true to the nobility of their profession and the Hippocratic oath which they took and took very seriously, have been using it, recommending it, and saving lives with it for months and months, and also screaming at the top of their lungs about it, only to be disparaged and marginalized for daring to presume that early treatment can reduce suffering and ease pain and save lives?

    Why?

    Why have you only now told the world about it from your bully pulpit granted you by the craven slavish media lapdogs?

    And why have all early treatment protocols, including but not limited to Monoclonal Antibody treatment, been ignored and criminally suppressed?

    Why is it, even today, in spite of the shocking side-effects and event reports, why is it vaccine or nothing?

    Now, no matter what move they make, reader, this is what you do: you decline their gambit and advance the following piece. This is a subtle move and a subtle piece, but it will devastate the opposition, effectively ending their sick and deadly game:

    “The natural immune protection that develops after a SARS-CoV-2 infection offers considerably more of a shield against the Delta variant of the pandemic coronavirus than two doses of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, according to a large Israeli study that some scientists wish came with a ‘Don’t try this at home’ label,” the Scientific American reported Thursday. “The newly released data show people who once had a SARS-CoV-2 infection were much less likely than vaccinated people to get Delta, develop symptoms from it, or become hospitalized with serious COVID-19.

    “Put another way, vaccinated individuals were 27 times more likely to get a symptomatic COVID infection than those with natural immunity from COVID.”

    That’s from a newly published medical study which confirmed what many, many, many good doctors and scientists have be screaming for a long time now:

    “Infection from COVID-19 confers considerably longer-lasting and stronger protection against the Delta variant of the virus than vaccines.”

    This is checkmate.

    The only way we could lose the game at this point is if we got up and left, effectively ignoring the opposition, and stopped playing the game, which we were drawn into by a hostile, manipulative, sloppy, cheating opponent.

    Yet don’t be surprised if, even now in the end-game, you begin hearing all the major mainstream media outlets next attacking and ridiculing Monoclonal Antibody treatment — the stuff of fantasies, they might say, purely ineffective for this type of novel virus and all its variants — though these major media outlets will all have a considerably and forbiddingly more difficult job ahead of them in taking on this particular early treatment protocol, no matter how slick their propaganda, and all because of the game-ending blunder of their sloppy bishop.

    They’ve lost.

    The question is: will the world wake up and recognize it?


    August 30th, 2021 | journalpulp | No Comments |

About The Author

Ray Harvey

I was born and raised in the San Juan Mountains of southwestern Colorado. I've worked as a short-order cook, construction laborer, crab fisherman, janitor, bartender, pedi-cab driver, copyeditor, and more. I've written and ghostwritten several published books and articles, but no matter where I've gone or what I've done to earn my living, there's always been literature and learning as the constant in my life.

Leave a Reply

* Name, Email, and Comment are Required

%d bloggers like this: